DNA Repair Mechanisms Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

DNA Repair Mechanisms - Research Paper ExampleThe optical parsimony of the culture was maintained at 540 nm. The cultures were then overt to different levels of UV-C, and were subsequently added to prewarmed ST medium. It was then incubated in the dyed at 80C with shaking. To determine which cells were viable, irradiated and control samples were grown in GT medium, diluted apply the very(prenominal) medium, and plated in the dark on 0.8% (wt/vol) Gelrite (Kelco) GT plates with pH = 3.0. The plates were placed in a humid chamber with a temperature of 80C for approximately 5 days, and colonies were counted. Meanwhile, increment footsteps were determined by spectrophotometric analysis at 540 nm of at least seven independent cultures grown in liquid, and generation times were cipher using Prizm 4.0 software. To visualize chromosomal damage, 4 x 109 suspended cells (optical density at 540 nm of 0.2 to 0.4) exposed to UV were obtained at 2-4 hours from the culture, and were treated with proteinase K and SfiI. The treated cell solutions were run using pulse-field jelly electrophoresis (PFGE) with a buffer temperature of 14C. with gels made of 1% agarose, 0.5xx TBE (9 mM Tris, 9 mM boracic acid, 0.2 mM EDTA), and with running parameters of 24 h at 5.5 V/cm using a 120o include angle with switch times of 60 to 120 s. The gels were stained using ethidium bromide and, chromosome repair was deliberate using GeneTools quantification software, with the untreated sample designated as 100% repair. Finally, using PCR as well as gene and protein analysis, the sequences of the terce strains were compared. Gene expression was then analyzed using RNA isolation, cDNA preparation, and qRT-PCR. The strains react differently to the varying amounts of UV irradiation. Upon the assessment of colony formation on solid medium, at the lowest UV dose (100 mJ/cm2), all three strains demonstrated resistance, with the highest survival rate recorded from strain 98/2 (23%, as compared to P2-A and P2-B, which had 11% and 13%, respectively). On the former(a) hand, P2B was the most sensitive to 200 mJ/cm2, displaying 5- to 7-fold-lower survival than the other two strains, while 98/2 was the most sensitive at 300 mJ/cm2. Next, the growth rate after UV exposure was determined. Normally, and at 100 mJ/cm2, 98/2 grew the fastest, although exposure to UV, despite using the lowest dose, resulted to a decreased growth rate for all the strains. On the other hand, both P2A and P2B regrew windy than 98/2 after exposure to 200 and 300 mJ/cm2. Despite differences in growth rates, the growth levels achieved for negative controls achieved the same levels as the UV-exposed set-ups. Upon SfiI digestion and PFGE, inherent differences in the genomic sequences of these three strains were seen. In UV-protected set-ups, P2A, 98/2 and P2B had two, three and four distinct digest fragments, respectively, which means that there are sequence disparities among the strains. After irradiation, double-strand break formation, seen as lower molecular weight smears at the bottom of the gel, was present for all the strains, with most breaks and slowest exquisite (50%) repair rate observed from P2B. Overall, however, 98/2